The federal government may take another crack at La Lomita Chapel.
U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Laredo, attempted to protect La Lomita from the border wall last month. With just a few sentences buried in the federal budget, Cuellar prohibited the government from building “pedestrian fencing” within La Lomita historical park.
“While we have taken La Lomita Chapel out of this pursuant to Congress,” Smith said, referencing the budget language, “there may be another filing involving La Lomita Chapel. Not for a border wall but for roads. Because, if they build in that area, what we will have is a gap in the patrol roads that go on top of the wall and on bottom of the wall. And the roads weren’t excepted by congressional action.”
Asked about what Smith said, U.S. Customs and Border Protection issued a statement Thursday afternoon.
“At this time, CBP does not anticipate executing additional condemnation actions to survey the La Lomita chapel property for a road,” according to the statement. “In the event CBP later determines that surveys on the La Lomita property are required, it is always CBP’s preference to access to property (sic) for surveys through a voluntary right-of-entry process, using condemnation only when necessary such as when land ownership records are unclear or when a landowner cannot be contacted or identified.”
The Catholic Diocese of Brownsville, which opposes the border wall as a matter of principle, refused to allow surveyors access to La Lomita. When the diocese refused to cooperate, the government filed a lawsuit.
Smith withdrew the request to survey La Lomita on March 6. Throughout the discussion, however, Smith cautioned that attorneys for the government may file a new lawsuit to survey La Lomita for a road.
When, exactly, that may happen Smith didn’t say.
“He hasn’t told me that, definitely, they’re going to do it,” said attorney David C. Garza, who represents the diocese.
Customs and Border Protection plans to build an “all-weather aggregate patrol road” south of the wall, according to planning documents. Breaks in the road would hinder Border Patrol agents.
Without permission from Bishop Daniel A. Flores and the city of Mission, any attempt to survey La Lomita for a road would require another lawsuit.
“If we’re doing a road, I’ll probably file one just for that road,” Smith said during the hearing. “For that area.”
Whether or not the government will attempt to build roads through other property where the federal budget prohibited pedestrian fencing — the Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuge, Bentsen-Rio Grande Valley State Park, the National Butterfly Center and part of the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge — remains unclear.
Cuellar, who attempted to protect parks and wildlife refuges from the border wall, wasn’t available for comment.
Similar uncertainty may exist in Starr County, where budget language drafted by Cuellar required the government to consult with residents about the location of physical barriers. The language didn’t mention roads.
“Until they do something, there’s really nothing for us to do,” Garza said. “So I’m not really going to worry about it.”